Lif wrote:Well...if I ever lost my child as an infant I do not think I would want any kind of substitute (how can there every be ANY kind)...certainly not a plastic one. I feel it would degrade the memory of the child I lost. I do understand the loss and need of something to hold on to but I think that doing it would keep your dealing with that loss to a minimum. Maybe I am wrong but I do not see anything good coming from using a doll as a substitute...
Luckily I don't need to find out..
I agree, I think it would degrade the memory. Holding a fake baby just seems like it would be worse in every way cause it's like holding a dead baby and if one has lost a child.... I don't follow how that could be healthy in any way. It seems as if it would holding the person suffering from loss in a mental stasis. The fake plastic baby isn't going to grow up. How long do we wallow in our pain and despair? With a fake baby you can wallow for years. And following that logic, do we get silicone grandparents when we lose them? I don't think it's a healthy way of dealing with loss. People usually get a dog, cat, parrot, or something ALIVE to nurture. Something that loves back. Or stares lazily at you while demanding food. ha. But something that moves of it's own accord. Not a corpse-like creepy fake baby. Pseudo-baby. Can't cope with reality baby. I just think there are healthier crutches out there than this.
If folks really just love babies, and baby dolls, and just like collecting them as dolls then that's completely different. One of my friends collects dog figurines in the same way, and I have 30-something resin and vinyl dolls in my office so it's not like I don't understand that angle.
There's a strong difference between collecting a representation of something you like (dogs, dolls/characters, Breyer horses, etc) versus clinging to a representation of loss and pain.